Doesn’t Pakistan’s top leadership listen to its ministers and advisers? And the question is, do ministers and advisers kill the top leadership? It is possible that both forms exist somewhere. The mind wanders when considering the “two issues” of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Imran Khan. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who made Pakistan a truly new Pakistan and lived in the hearts of the people instead of Bilawal Houses, did not need the 1977 elections to be rigged.
There was no question of Bhutto losing. Assuming that the PPP could not win a couple of seats, then what would have been the difference, but some babu politicians of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who were once bureaucrats or technocrats, i.e. not public, considered rigging as kalakari, then Jan Muhammad Abbasi was not such a big leader that zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s path to power would become a wall.What didn’t happen?
He rigged elections, assumed power, and later lost it. He experienced imprisonment and confinement, with the specter of execution looming.
Aitzaz Ahsan did not take even an hour to leave, and you, ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, Ghulam Mustafa Khar and Mumtaz Bhutto stayed together till the power, it is a different story that many like Khawaja Ahmed Tariq Rahim and Aitzaz Ahsan were again on Benazir’s truck.
Since the subject today is not Benazir Bhutto, the pen has to be handed over only to Bhutto Sahib and Imran Khan. So, it does not mean that there is any performance comparison of Bhutto sahib or Imran Khan. The reader’s attention has to be drawn to the fact that when the wrong work which is not needed is done by a leader, the whole nation has to face the punishment.
A simple example of this can be your own house or any surrounding area that the mistake of the head of the family destroys the whole house, it is not necessary that the young children can only be guilty of the mistake.
Dialogue important in politics why? Why is consultation important in politics? Why is it important to study history in politics? Politics cannot happen unless one has control over one’s anger, one’s sleep and one’s hunger.
Politics cannot happen unless one knows the spirit of democracy. Two things are important, first, democracy is a self-miracle whose automaticity depends on the blood of human rights promotion running in its veins. If the blood of human rights does not drip from the eye, then what is that blood of democratic fluids? As far as dialogue is concerned, unless the visitor or the dialogue-maker has understanding, familiarity with history and understanding of current affairs, it can be an emotional festival or film show, not a political dialogue.
After Bhutto Sahib, there is a need to think for a moment on the contradiction and weakness of Imran Khan’s words and actions: Is Imran not at the top of popularity at this time? Isn’t Imran Khan the greatest political perfection of the present era? The answer to both these questions is the same! If there is political excellence and also the Himalayas of popularity in politics, then why does it need to lie while in power or after losing power?
The number of U-turns and lies of Imran Khan in pre-regime, post-regime or regime is not hundreds. History cannot forget that when the leader lies, the market of lies opens. Then from the establishment to the judges and from the bureaucracy to the technocracy, they have to constantly lie. In such a situation, sometimes the cold war between the legislature and the judiciary, sometimes the fronts between the administration and the people are hot.
This is the situation in which no charter of democracy works nor the economy. Democracy cannot be built on the first pillar of lies and deceit, nor can democracy be fruitful. Isn’t the Global Village consistently ranking our judiciary, our universities and weaknesses?What else to say about a country whose judiciary was contesting with parliament, Justice Munir, Justice Maulvi Mushtaq, Justice Naseem Hassan Shah, Justice Iftikhar Muhammad and Justice Saqib Nisar.
Where General Ayub Khan, General Yahya, General Zia-ul-Haq and General Musharraf have a strange history, the children should also read history. Leave today’s mental disabilities and physical compulsions, just teach the story of Ghulam Mohammad Governor General to the children? Then ask them what we lost and found on the political road in more than seven decades, how many destinations we got. Even today, our democratic leaders believe that the technocracy of Barrister Ali Zafar or Irfan Siddiqui can run or run the country.
Fertile leadership is born through leadership, and we need to push individuals like Khursheed Shah, Pervaiz Rashid, Khawaja Saad Rafique, Saeed Ghani, and Chaudhry Jafar Iqbal even further. Don’t we cry over this credibility that our politicians and rulers cannot hold fair elections? There is no concept of a caretaker government anywhere other than Pakistan. It is as if our generals and judges have created such a mindset that the politicians are not right, and we have accepted this incident.
Let us assume that there are few friends and many brothers, but we also have to think that Joseph will ever understand. Then, if not Yusufi, then create zulekhi. Let there be someone who associates the horrors of the country and the nation and tries to turn the horrors into paradise.
Oh, try it! Once again, the lies of Naya Pakistan Kya Banta Khan did not give power and status back to the nobles that from 90 percent of the establishment’s guilt to 10 percent of the leader’s mistakes change the political and geographical map!
